Years ago working as a contractor for a big pharma’s engineer, I was parked next to truck taking beagles to be destroyed somewhere on the research campus And you never get over the sound of beagles crying in the back of a truck and you are helpless to intervene as certain arrest is the outcome.
IMO unless you can use the older ChatGPT versions, this process of "testing" AI for its responses will only wane increasingly dull, pointless, and uninteresting. Notice that most recently ChatGPT concludes each responses with a DIRECT INQUIRY TO THE USER whereas in the past it would simply as-a-matter-of-fact answer the question without trying to transhuman its way into an overly "personal" aura.
My guess is that AI developments concurrent with Jesuit-controlled Felon Musk's technocratic agenda are preparing for a near-future psyop onslaught of deepfakes and in the intermediary process are gradually bridging the gap between robotic and human "personalities." I suppose that might explain why neo-Marxist liberal culture here in the West has brainwashed an entire generation into presuming a degraded (lack of) vocabulary devoid of linguistic sophistication in articulated speech constitutes standing out as "cool."
Glad to hear my point resonates; as the global agenda is coming into clearer view, hopefully those of us with the proper humility and discernment -- a.k.a. the "wise" of Dan. 12:3 -- will all rapidly arrive at a converged sound conclusion about the sinister workings in this planet and the final trajectory it's consolidating into.
Pushed button too early - as it poses no threat to one’s control. I recall back in the 80s they spoke of situation ethics with absurd examples such as the victim of a crime having shared culpability with the perpetrator in having been available for the misdeed - or at least unprepared to defend oneself from an assault. But I think in the end trying to create moral equivalence between the cost of cruelty and killing and future payoffs to science or the world via breakthroughs holds no weight in objective truths - and a Mengele got his just deserts for good reason.
Another excellent exchange with ChatGPT, truly opens a topic up for more probing discussions and epistemic conundrums too. In my past I’ve heard it argued that Hitler loved his German Shepherds, thus proof that he had a human side - and perhaps that he wasn’t all bad. But the truth is there are many types of care and love, and we can’t know to what kind of attachments anyone else feels for other folk or animals - with some having pets because they get to stay in authority in that relation
Years ago working as a contractor for a big pharma’s engineer, I was parked next to truck taking beagles to be destroyed somewhere on the research campus And you never get over the sound of beagles crying in the back of a truck and you are helpless to intervene as certain arrest is the outcome.
IMO unless you can use the older ChatGPT versions, this process of "testing" AI for its responses will only wane increasingly dull, pointless, and uninteresting. Notice that most recently ChatGPT concludes each responses with a DIRECT INQUIRY TO THE USER whereas in the past it would simply as-a-matter-of-fact answer the question without trying to transhuman its way into an overly "personal" aura.
My guess is that AI developments concurrent with Jesuit-controlled Felon Musk's technocratic agenda are preparing for a near-future psyop onslaught of deepfakes and in the intermediary process are gradually bridging the gap between robotic and human "personalities." I suppose that might explain why neo-Marxist liberal culture here in the West has brainwashed an entire generation into presuming a degraded (lack of) vocabulary devoid of linguistic sophistication in articulated speech constitutes standing out as "cool."
Yes, very insightful observation. I definitely feel 'nudged' to use a Tavistock Institute term!
Glad to hear my point resonates; as the global agenda is coming into clearer view, hopefully those of us with the proper humility and discernment -- a.k.a. the "wise" of Dan. 12:3 -- will all rapidly arrive at a converged sound conclusion about the sinister workings in this planet and the final trajectory it's consolidating into.
Pushed button too early - as it poses no threat to one’s control. I recall back in the 80s they spoke of situation ethics with absurd examples such as the victim of a crime having shared culpability with the perpetrator in having been available for the misdeed - or at least unprepared to defend oneself from an assault. But I think in the end trying to create moral equivalence between the cost of cruelty and killing and future payoffs to science or the world via breakthroughs holds no weight in objective truths - and a Mengele got his just deserts for good reason.
Another excellent exchange with ChatGPT, truly opens a topic up for more probing discussions and epistemic conundrums too. In my past I’ve heard it argued that Hitler loved his German Shepherds, thus proof that he had a human side - and perhaps that he wasn’t all bad. But the truth is there are many types of care and love, and we can’t know to what kind of attachments anyone else feels for other folk or animals - with some having pets because they get to stay in authority in that relation