4 Comments
User's avatar
Denise Rondano's avatar

In early to mid 2020 the 10 years prior of animal studies on mRNA technology were more widely discussed until censorship ensued. Why are these failed animal studies never discussed at this point? I would think the animal studies that prevented this technology from being used on humans would be equally as important at this time. The clinical studies done on humans in 2020 were not conducted scientifically, nor were the results reported transparently.

Being rational is always important. But at least consider what we were facing back in 2020 in view of failed animal studies for the 10 years prior

Sorry, I have no data as a lay person anymore as most of what I had has been scrubbed.

I refer you to Sasha Latypova’s Substack Due Diligence and Art for an abundance of data and FOIA requests with data.

I have grown weary of soft petaling the negative effects of these jabs by AI or real people.

Expand full comment
Timothy Winey's avatar

All true! Sasha has their number.

Expand full comment
RedStateNW's avatar

Interesting exchange. Even AI starts with denial, then softens with your repeated lines of inquiry, then begins to readily admit to vaxx harms and insupportable risks. 5.6 biillion injected (AI confirmed) in this globally coordinated plan. Nice work Tim.

Expand full comment
Timothy Winey's avatar

Yes, I seem to be wearing it down!

Expand full comment