Charlie was a lucky boy; he got 1 of just 5 golden tickets. We’ve all seen the film and or read the book (I don’t count the sequel as worth watching, [sorry Johnny]). This got me wondering about the ‘science’ of statistics. Now I’m not anti-science, and we need statistics, but not the kind our beloved CDC has been practicing as of late; that’s more akin to witchcraft.
Number crunching and law of probability work to support likelihoods... but when you have pages and pages of adverse possibilities assigned to a vaccine that you publish before the first shot goes into a person.. then more pages of the death and misery that happens after you jab multitudes of the healthy.. it gets very hard to deny correlation when you already showed likely outcomes... numbers never lie.. it’s people who hide truth and crunch numbers.
And people tend to think science cannot be wrong. In fact, if part of the equation is misinterpreted or faulty, it is faulty science!
We got the wrong answer!
Now, whether all this devilish chaos was planned to hide their ugly deeds or not, we may never know, but they look pretty darned suspicious, moreso every day.
If people can’t wake up with all the death and suffering from the mRNA jab they never will
Number crunching and law of probability work to support likelihoods... but when you have pages and pages of adverse possibilities assigned to a vaccine that you publish before the first shot goes into a person.. then more pages of the death and misery that happens after you jab multitudes of the healthy.. it gets very hard to deny correlation when you already showed likely outcomes... numbers never lie.. it’s people who hide truth and crunch numbers.
Excellent point!!!
And people tend to think science cannot be wrong. In fact, if part of the equation is misinterpreted or faulty, it is faulty science!
We got the wrong answer!
Now, whether all this devilish chaos was planned to hide their ugly deeds or not, we may never know, but they look pretty darned suspicious, moreso every day.