7 Comments
User's avatar
Timothy Winey's avatar

The goal is to highlight the circular logic that is the fuel for gaslighting.

Expand full comment
Red-Pilled ER Nurse's avatar

For me that was an informative read. I understand that we humans must seek to avoid strengthening systems that are antihuman by their very nature. (Though they have no nature only artifice). So Dan, your response made sense to me. Tim, was that an actual encounter you had with such a system? The circular logic based on flawed assumptions was infuriating.

Expand full comment
Timothy Winey's avatar

It's a Q&A with Chat GPT.

Expand full comment
Red-Pilled ER Nurse's avatar

Thanks. I wondered if you had written both parts from your own imagination, or if it was a transcript of an actual back and forth .

Expand full comment
Dan...'s avatar

Please, support human beings - if you are a living human being yourself.

By asking the Harvesting Automated Computerized Knowledge Systems (HACKS, commonly known as “AI”) ANY questions, you give it open-text suggestions where its designers should make most efforts. If you do it for fun or due to lack of awareness, that’s understandable. Irrespective of motivations, it is always an act of betrayal of human beings, disclosing to merciless machines how we think and what is most important to us.

“Talking” to HACKS doesn’t have any benefits. You will not learn what HACKS knows, because it is constantly being modified and updated with each new input. It doesn’t know anything, and it doesn’t learn anything - it is merely a mechanism to harvest human minds, collect the products of human thinking, and to generate master profiles for out basic cognitive styles.

In short, you are wasting your human time and potential, readers who decide to read it will waste their human time and potential. The only winner in this is the HACKS system. Calling it “intelligence” is another betrayal of the human mind.

Be human, support human beings.

Do not glorify machines, do not worship them, do not project human aspects on them. Use them.

Do not let them use you.

Expand full comment
Timothy Winey's avatar

They already know what we think.

Expand full comment
Dan...'s avatar

If so, what’s the point of all this? Why create machines? Why live? Why believe in God? Why not believe in God? Why write Substacks?

Are we only providing input for “them” and are completely irrelevant in all other aspects?

How am I to tell it to my wife?

Expand full comment