In 2015, I was invited to present my research findings to a gathering of top scientists in Varna Bulgaria at the Physics, Chemistry and Biology of Water conference organized by Gerald Pollack of ‘Cells Gels and the Engines of Life’ fame.
https://www.amazon.com/Cells-Gels-Engines-Gerald-Pollack/dp/0962689513
The keynote speaker was none other than the late Luc Montagnier whose predictions in his last paper with Perez on mRNA ‘vaccines’ have proven both prophetic and horrifying, particularly in reference to mRNA-induced prion disease.
What many don’t know is how I ended up in front of some of the greatest minds of our time presenting my humble table top experiments, many of which were conducted in my kitchen. Well, the old saying is true. The bigger they are, the nicer they are, and you don’t get any bigger or nicer than Brian Josephson.
You see, like all original thinkers, Brian Josephson knows "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." I wrote the Nobel Laureate in 2014 when I lived just a stone’s throw from Cambridge briefly outlining my research. Because my experiments pointed to ‘hidden variables’ in the fabric of space, Josephson reached out to Pollack suggesting I present to his conference, and the rest is history. Josephson is a controversial figure because he, like other brilliant minds, pokes the scientific bear when it needs to awaken from hibernation, and no bear ever needed more poking than the one denying so-called LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) immortalized in the book ‘Fire from Ice’ by Eugene Mallove. https://www.amazon.com/Fire-Ice-Searching-Behind-Fusion/dp/1892925028
There are certain conventions in science that demand open sharing of methods and experimentation. I understand and accept this, however, like Rossi of Rossi Reactor fame, I too have trade secrets that need protecting and so cannot openly disclose how I generate what I call ‘Torsion Fields.’
https://e-catworld.com/
What I can do and have done however, is make available for inspection what I call ‘batteries’ (intermediate substances) that are capable of radiating powerful torsion fields for a limited time. This enables other scientists to conduct their own experiments as if they had a torsion field generator at their disposal. The down side to this is that my ‘batteries’ don’t seem to travel well and so have yielded mixed results when posted to others. I don’t know if it’s because of X-Rays bombarding them, changes in air pressure aboard aircraft, or other factors, but I have been frustrated by this aberration. This has somewhat limited the ability of others to validate my experiments.
Incidentally, Josephson laid his scientific reputation on the line by endorsing the Rossi reactor results by making the simple observation that the amount of excess heat released from the reactor cannot be trickery for the simple reason that there is no known chemical reaction capable of releasing that amount of excess heat in such a small volume of space.
This simple statement of fact went over like a lead balloon filled with Hydrogen, not too unlike Richard Feynman dunking O-Rings in ice water during Congressional hearings on the Shuttle disaster.
The fuel combustion, Infra-red absorption and mass spectrometry experiments, among others, that I conducted under the supervision of academics at UK universities, were all done with ‘batteries.’ This is why I am frustrated with the batteries’ seeming inconsistent ability to hold their ‘charge’ during travel (when posted).
Many don’t know this, but Einstein and Wilhelm Reich corresponded extensively. Reich measured temperature differences inside special boxes made up of alternating layers of conductive and insulating material. This, Reich believed, was direct evidence of some kind of luminiferous aether. I, and others, am convinced that Einstein replicated Reich’s experiments and indeed did measure temperature differences that he (Einstein) couldn’t explain. This would have invalidated, at least partially, Einstein’s theories and by that time, he was already world famous.
https://arcanum.ca/2012/11/18/the-einstein-affair-why-truth-can-be-the-hardest-thing-to-accept/
http://exo-science.com/reich-einstein.pdf
Nothing is more mysterious or controversial than water. Yet any time anyone, no matter how credentialed, brings up water as anything but a passive bystander in chemistry, physics or biology, he’s immediately labeled a kook. The Rossi reactor presumably uses water, as did the Pons/Fleischmann apparatus. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/its-not-cold-fusion-but-its-something/
Anyone who tells you they understand water in all its facets, is a liar, and yet Homeopathy is likely the most poo pooed topic of all, this despite ‘water memory’ lying seemingly at the heart of its effects.
Now we arrive at the greatest crime, scandal and fraud in all of human history, the plandemic, and what seems to be emerging at the center of it all, water! That’s right folks, water. As I have explained in earlier posts, the work of Bobo Feng et al. showed that the form and function of DNA is regulated by the ‘hydrophobic effect’ and not hydrogen bonding as previously thought, and what did Feng use to disrupt this delicate balance on which DNA relies for its proper form and function? You guessed it, PEG (Polyethylene Glycol) https://medlineplus.gov/druginfo/meds/a603032.html. What are the odds that PEG would be center stage in the mRNA ingredients? Coincidence? Was Hillary Clinton as lucky with cattle futures as her many friends were unlucky meeting untimely deaths? Coincidences abound…
Now, many of my experiments have shown clear alterations to hydrophobicity. If this is true (it is), and alterations to hydrophobicity disrupt normal DNA form and function, and by logical extension, are likely mutagenic (they are), then would it not make sense to test my water for its ability to restore normal hydrophobicity? Why not indeed; the question answers itself.
Discussion about this post
No posts
fascinating! kind of over my head, but worth keeping Somewhere In My Mind as useful information.
It reminds me of people who claim that sodium lauryl sulfate, found in almost all toothpaste, causes canker sores by dissolving the cell membranes in your mouth. Then I saw a very dramatic video about growing heart cells on a scaffolding with a heart shape. Eventually this heart started beating on its own! Here's the kicker, the part that impressed me: the pure white scaffolding was actually a mouse heart that had all the cells on it dissolved off, leaving only the connective tissue. And what was used to dissolve the cells? Sodium Lauryl sulfate of course!
So I never buy toothpaste that has that as an ingredient, and I would certainly never allow someone to inject PEG into my body 🤪
I have wondered how PEG in toothpaste and so many products for personal care is safe while ethylene glycol which is antifreeze, is extremely toxic if ingested? https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/research/literature-data/article/21837164/comparatively-speaking-ppg-vs-peg