At the risk of ‘risking’ my mortal soul by mixing the Bible with science, I cannot resist the temptation to draw the analogy they both afford. Full disclosure, I’m fighting a nasty bug while writing this, so it might be half fever, half inspiration.
We have all been taught that the love of money is the root of all evil, but I kinda ‘like’ money, and don’t consider myself particularly evil? Not all poor people are virtuous, and not all rich are devils. That being said, I have seen money ruin people; it’s a sight to behold.
Many physics terms have been commandeered to serve the ‘science’ of economics, albeit all too often imprecisely. Our old friend ChatGPT can provide us with some examples:
Physics Context: Elasticity in physics refers to the property of a material to return to its original shape or size after being stretched or compressed.
Economics Context: Elasticity in economics measures the responsiveness of one economic variable (e.g., quantity demanded) to a change in another variable (e.g., price). It reflects how much the quantity demanded or supplied changes in response to a percentage change in price or income.
Momentum:
Physics Context: Momentum in physics is the product of an object's mass and velocity, indicating its motion.
Economics Context: In economics, the term momentum is sometimes used metaphorically to describe the persistence or continuation of a trend in economic indicators or financial markets. It suggests that trends, once established, may continue for some time.
Equilibrium:
Physics Context: In physics, equilibrium refers to a state in which opposing forces or influences are balanced, resulting in a stable system.
Economics Context: Equilibrium in economics often refers to a situation where the supply of goods and services matches the demand, resulting in stable prices. It is a key concept in economic models and analysis.
Frictional Unemployment:
Physics Context: Frictional forces in physics describe the resistance to motion encountered when two objects move against each other.
Economics Context: Frictional unemployment refers to the temporary unemployment that arises when individuals are in the process of moving between jobs. It represents the time and effort it takes for workers to find new employment opportunities.
Quantum Leap:
Physics Context: In quantum mechanics, a quantum leap refers to an abrupt change in the state of a quantum system, typically involving the absorption or emission of energy.
Economics Context: The term "quantum leap" is sometimes used in economics to describe a significant and sudden change or advancement in economic conditions, technology, or productivity.
It's important to note that these terms are used metaphorically in economics, and their meanings in the economic context may not precisely correspond to their definitions in physics. The usage of physics terminology in economics often serves as a convenient way to convey complex ideas and dynamics.
What physical principles could we ascribe to the evil aspect of loving money? Is it that the love of money has its own kind of polarity? Does money itself seek, by some invisible force, enterprises that tend to exploitation rather than upliftment? When Jesus taught men to fish, should he have asked for a ‘cut’ and if so, how much of a return would have been fair (this is an analogy, so put your voodoo dolls away please).
Can ‘moral’ projects ever be reconciled with the fiduciary responsibility to investors? For there to be charity, one needs something to give? How does one acquire wealth to give away, or even teach fishing? Can a starving man take the time to share his fishing wisdom with those less fortunate?
I am utterly fascinated with the sheer amount of money that goes into allopathic medicine with what it has to show for a return in health. Indeed, it seems almost to be an inverse relationship, but how can this be? Well, simple, investors invest to make more money, and if they create side effects that in turn require more drugs, society is sickened but they make more money.
But alas, this cycle cannot continue forever since sick people cannot accumulate enough wealth for it to be mined from them. Have we reached the bottom? It seems we are close. If a window salesman keeps smashing windows to make sales beyond the local businesses’ ability to pay for replacements, he puts himself out of business too, but not before destroying his neighborhood. And if he is found out, enjoying his wealth would likely be difficult.
So is money literally repelled from moral projects, like opposing magnetic fields? Does money seek immoral and or amoral projects because it needs to be able to cut and run when profits fall?
There is no doubt that the vaccines are deadly and sterilizing. If you cannot accept this, stop reading here. But they are more than this, they threaten the human genome itself and by extension, our very species. What would saving humanity be worth? A cure for cancer was estimated to be worth 50 + trillion in 2006 give or take, so what about reversing humanity’s demise? Such a feat must certainly be worth more?
Now I’m not greedy, I’ll do it for the low low price of the combined wealth of Bill Gates and Larry Fink with the added condition that they are jailed. You see, the Plandemic was engineered by them and their ilk for reasons too complex to go into here.
Lest you think I’m joking, I’m not, well, only half joking. You see, the structure and function of DNA relies on the hydrophobic effect, the disruptions of which, are likely catastrophic for health, reproduction and eventually the survival of our species. Still not interested? What are the odds gates and Fink will see the error of their ways, repent, and pour all their ill-gotten wealth into my research?
Well, I reckon my chances are slim, since the destruction of all we know isn’t a bug in their plans, it’s a feature.
So is a quantum leap toward moral investment possible, or are we talking about apples from Eden and oranges?
References:
1. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1909122116
2. https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?pid=10.5281%2Fzenodo.7668572
3. https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/12
6.
7. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359344353_Thixotropy_with_a_twist2
8. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/04/060426174214.htm
Spot-on article, Tim!
I've been thinking about the "cure for cancer." One thing I'm convinced of is that our current corrupt and captured science and healthcare establishment is NOT going to find that cure.
The person who cures cancers is going to have to take on - and defeat - the entire corrupt medical/science establishment.
We also never think about all of the things that don't happen because some key organizations are captured and doing things the wrong way - like, "cancer research."