Re-Thinking Stochasticity
Timothy Winey
Monday, February 5, 2024
I have been giving a great deal of thought to entropy as of late. It seems that society, politics, the environment (the real environment, not the unicorn fantasies of climate change lunatics), family, country, and of course, health, are all suffering an acceleration of entropy, none more obvious that the Covid Jab-Ees. Indeed, there are numerous theories of aging and disease that revolve around the concept of entropy.
After thinking about my presentation in 2015 to a gathering of top scientists
I was struck by what I can only describe as a minor epiphany. Several of my experiments showed uncharacteristic boundary layer formations, formations far too distinct to be reflective of purely stochastic processes. It seems that the ‘random’ quantumelectrodynamic fluctuations of water molecules might not be so random after all, at least not water exposed to Torsion Fields.
Indeed, it seems intuitive that the only way such clean (apparently non-random) phase separations would be possible would be if some underlying negative entropic process/es were at work. Tornadoes don’t assemble scrap metal into jumbo jets, any more than ‘random’ water molecule fluctuations should be capable of producing such clean boundary layers.
I strongly suspect that the mRNA vaccines, in addition to all the specific harms they are proven to pose, harm detailed much more expertly by others more qualified than I, also represent more broadly, a loss of negative entropy, or if you like, an increase in biological entropy. One concrete example of this increased entropy is the seeming random production of foreign proteins by a so-called ‘frame shifting’ process outlined by Perez in a recent pre-print, a pre-print terrifying in its implications, if true.
References: