For Sale, Cancer Cure, 55 Trillion Dollars, or Best Offer

(See fine print disclaimer below for details)

For Sale, Cancer Cure, 55 Trillion Dollars,

or Best Offer

(See fine print disclaimer below for details)

When your doctor shows you an MRI scan of ‘bad news,’ you aren’t actually looking at cancer; instead, you are looking at disordered water in and around the cancer cells.  https://www.hindawi.com/journals/physiology/2014/763879/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4512706/

https://oicr.on.ca/innovative-mri-shines-new-light-on-cancer/

 ‘Cancer water’ is different from non-cancer water, that’s how and MRI can distinguish cancer from healthy tissue.  Without boring you with the physics of water molecules and magnetic fields, suffice it to say that water in and around cancer cells has a different structure and behaves differently; if it didn’t, MRI’s wouldn’t be of much use. 

Some years ago, two Chicago economists put their heads together to try and calculate the savings to America if indeed a cure for cancer could be found, they landed on a figure around 55 trillion, with a T.  This was strictly a monetary calculation, leaving out the untold human misery of the dreaded menace, a menace we have been fighting a ‘war’ on longer than Afghanistan.  It turns out, this war was and remains a half-hearted one owing to greed.  What has greed to do with science, you say?  Turns out, plenty; just ask Goldman Sachs.

https://www.mossreports.com/goldman-sachs-to-biotech-dont-cure-cancer/

One can’t help wonder whether or not Goldman is also dishing out pandemic financial advice?

At any rate, here is a thought experiment for any remaining scientists out there who don’t have their wallets surgically attached to their ethics.  If ‘cancer water’ has a different structure than non-cancer water (the MRI tells us it does), and it’s impossible to get cancer without the accompanying water changes (it is), then what would happen if the water in your body was prevented from undergoing ‘cancerfication’ (if that’s a word). What indeed? 

Remember, the very definition of cancer, at least as far as an MRI is concerned, is the surrounding water properties.  So I ask the question again, could cancer be prevented or reversed if ‘cancer water’ could be either replaced, or prevented from forming in the first place?  How do you think Goldman Sachs would respond to such a proposition?  Probably the same way organized dentistry would respond to a vaccine cure for cavities. 

On a slightly more scientific note; not all water is equal, and many scientists, yours truly included, have treated water non-chemically with measurable differences when compared to controls.  So, what would it cost to test whether or not ingesting ‘altered’ water could prevent or reverse cancer?  I have no idea, but feel confident in stating that it would be less than 55 trillion. 

Disclaimer:  This monograph is not, nor should it be construed as, an actual offer for sale, any service or product designed to mitigate or treat cancer or any other illness.  Furthermore, the use of the phrase ‘For Sale’ was merely a literary device not meant to be construed under law as commerce. This monograph was written for entertainment and educational purposes only.  It was also a feeble attempt to shame those who profit from human misery.