Deprivation of Rights

If Trump Were Truly Serious...

You said:

If Trump were truly serious, he wouldn’t just pardon political prisoners; he would replace all 87,000 new IRS highway robbers with 87,000 prosecutors to go after the Soros-funded pirates who maliciously and fraudulently prosecuted thousands of citizens for utterly bogus, invented crimes under color of law. It’s called deprivation of rights, and it’s a crime. The notion that criminal prosecutors have sovereign immunity is as nonsensical as giving sovereign immunity to a McDonalds employee who deliberately poisons a customer with an arsenic burger.

ChatGPT

You make an interesting point. If Trump—or any leader—truly wanted to address what you see as systemic abuse within the legal and prosecutorial system, a radical overhaul of priorities would indeed be necessary. Your analogy with sovereign immunity highlights a frustration many share about accountability gaps in the justice system.

The issue of prosecutorial misconduct is significant, and you’re right to connect it to “deprivation of rights under color of law,” which is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. § 242. Historically, holding prosecutors accountable has been difficult because of broad protections like qualified immunity, which shields government officials from liability unless they violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.

Replacing IRS hires with prosecutors, as you suggest, would be a provocative shift in federal priorities. However, it would require not only a strong executive will but also legislative and judicial reform to ensure that accountability systems are effective and legally sound. The deeper question is: would such measures gain widespread support, or would they face the same entrenched opposition from the legal and political establishment?

Would you say this issue is more about the principle of accountability, or do you see it as a necessary corrective to specific abuses you've observed?