User
What are hives?
ChatGPT
Hives, also known as urticaria, are a common skin reaction characterized by raised, red, itchy welts or bumps on the skin. They can vary in size and shape and may appear suddenly and disappear just as quickly. Hives can be acute, lasting for a few hours to several weeks, or chronic, lasting for more than six weeks.
Hives occur when certain cells in the skin release histamine and other chemicals into the bloodstream in response to an allergen or other triggers such as stress, infection, temperature changes, or certain medications. Common allergens that can trigger hives include certain foods (such as nuts, shellfish, or eggs), insect stings, medications (like antibiotics or NSAIDs), pollen, latex, and animal dander.
In most cases, hives are harmless and can be treated with over-the-counter antihistamines to relieve itching and discomfort. However, if hives are accompanied by difficulty breathing, swelling of the face or throat, dizziness, or other severe symptoms, it's important to seek immediate medical attention as it may indicate a more serious allergic reaction or underlying medical condition.
User
The European medicines agency has now acknowledged that mRNA vaccines cause chronic hives in some people.
ChatGPT
As of my last update in January 2022, there wasn't widespread acknowledgment by regulatory agencies like the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding chronic hives specifically linked to mRNA vaccines. While allergic reactions, including hives, have been reported following COVID-19 vaccination, they are generally rare and occur in a small percentage of vaccinated individuals.
It's essential to rely on updated and credible sources for information regarding vaccine safety and adverse reactions. Regulatory agencies like the EMA continuously monitor vaccine safety and update their guidance based on new evidence and reports of adverse events.
If there have been updates since my last training data, it's advisable to consult recent information from trusted health authorities or regulatory agencies for the latest guidance on vaccine safety.
User
It's March 2024 now.
ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I don't have access to real-time information or updates beyond my last training data in January 2022. If the European Medicines Agency or any other regulatory body has made announcements or updates regarding the association between mRNA vaccines and chronic hives since then, I wouldn't be aware of them. I recommend consulting the latest information from reputable sources such as official health agencies, scientific publications, or medical experts for the most up-to-date and accurate information on this topic.
User
I'm making you aware now!
ChatGPT
Thank you for bringing it to my attention. If the European Medicines Agency or any other regulatory agency has acknowledged a link between mRNA vaccines and chronic hives, it's significant information that should be taken into account in discussions surrounding vaccine safety and potential side effects. It underscores the importance of ongoing monitoring and research into the safety profile of vaccines to ensure that they are as effective and safe as possible for the population.
User
So much for 'safe and effective!' I guess long-term safety testing isn't a waste of time after all?
ChatGPT
Long-term safety testing is indeed crucial in understanding the potential effects of vaccines and other medical interventions over time. While extensive clinical trials are conducted before vaccines are authorized for public use, ongoing monitoring through post-marketing surveillance is essential to detect any rare or long-term adverse effects that may not have been evident during initial testing.
The acknowledgment of potential side effects, such as chronic hives, underscores the complexity of vaccine safety and the importance of continuous monitoring and research. It's essential to balance the benefits of vaccination in preventing diseases with the need to thoroughly understand and mitigate any potential risks.
It's worth noting that vaccines undergo rigorous testing and evaluation to ensure their safety and efficacy before they are approved for use. However, no medical intervention is entirely without risk, and rare adverse effects may only become apparent after a vaccine is administered to millions of people.
Overall, ongoing monitoring and research play a critical role in maintaining public confidence in vaccination programs and ensuring that vaccines continue to be safe and effective tools in protecting public health.
User
If it's so crucial, why was it skipped in favor of rushing jabs to 5 billion victims?
ChatGPT
The decision to expedite the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines was driven by the urgent need to address a global health crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic posed an unprecedented threat to public health, causing widespread illness, death, and economic disruption worldwide. Governments, public health agencies, and pharmaceutical companies prioritized accelerating vaccine development and deployment to save lives, reduce transmission, and control the spread of the virus.
While the urgency of the situation led to an expedited timeline for vaccine development, it's important to note that safety remained a top priority throughout the process. Vaccine candidates underwent rigorous testing in clinical trials to evaluate their safety and efficacy before receiving emergency use authorization or full approval from regulatory agencies.
However, the accelerated timeline meant that some aspects of the usual vaccine development process, such as long-term safety monitoring, occurred concurrently with vaccine distribution and administration. Post-marketing surveillance systems were established to monitor adverse events and ensure the ongoing safety of COVID-19 vaccines as they were rolled out to millions of people.
It's also worth noting that the technology used in some COVID-19 vaccines, such as mRNA vaccines, had been under development for years before the pandemic, which helped expedite the vaccine development process.
While the rapid development and deployment of COVID-19 vaccines were necessary to respond to the urgent public health crisis, ongoing monitoring and research continue to be critical to ensure the long-term safety and effectiveness of these vaccines.
User
Even though death risk due to Covid-19 was no greater than a typical flu season?
ChatGPT
Comparing the risk of COVID-19 to that of a typical flu season can be complex due to various factors, including the characteristics of the viruses, their impact on different populations, and the effectiveness of public health measures in mitigating spread. While both COVID-19 and influenza are respiratory illnesses caused by viruses, they have distinct features that influence their severity and impact.
COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus has led to significant morbidity and mortality globally, resulting in millions of deaths and overwhelming healthcare systems in many countries. Several factors contribute to the severity of COVID-19, including its higher transmissibility compared to seasonal influenza, the absence of pre-existing immunity in the population, and the potential for severe complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multi-organ failure, and long-term health effects in some individuals.
The risk of severe illness and death from COVID-19 varies across different population groups, with older adults and individuals with underlying health conditions being at higher risk of severe outcomes. However, COVID-19 can also cause severe illness and death in younger individuals without underlying health conditions, albeit at lower rates.
In contrast, seasonal influenza, while also capable of causing severe illness and death, typically has a lower overall case fatality rate compared to COVID-19. However, the severity of each flu season can vary, and influenza can still lead to significant morbidity and mortality, particularly among vulnerable populations such as the elderly, young children, and individuals with certain underlying health conditions.
Public health measures such as vaccination, mask-wearing, social distancing, and hand hygiene play essential roles in reducing the transmission of both COVID-19 and influenza and mitigating their impact on public health.
It's important to rely on scientific evidence and public health guidance to understand the risks associated with COVID-19 and influenza and to take appropriate measures to protect oneself and others from these respiratory illnesses.
User
There were no more deaths during the 'pandemic' than in a moderate flu season. The deaths only shot up due to hospitals murdering people with ventilators and later with vaccines.
ChatGPT
It's crucial to rely on accurate and evidence-based information when discussing public health issues such as the COVID-19 pandemic. While it's true that there has been significant debate and discussion surrounding various aspects of the pandemic response, including the efficacy of certain treatments and public health measures, it's essential to approach these discussions with a commitment to truthfulness and adherence to scientific evidence.
The assertion that deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic were no greater than in a typical flu season is not supported by comprehensive data and analysis. COVID-19 has resulted in millions of deaths worldwide, overwhelming healthcare systems in many countries and causing significant societal disruption.
The use of ventilators in the treatment of severe COVID-19 cases has been a subject of discussion and scrutiny, with medical professionals continuously refining treatment protocols based on emerging evidence and best practices. While ventilators are sometimes necessary in the management of severe respiratory failure associated with COVID-19, their use is carefully considered, and other treatments and interventions are also employed based on individual patient needs and clinical judgment.
Regarding vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines have undergone rigorous testing and evaluation to demonstrate their safety and efficacy before receiving authorization or approval for emergency use. Vaccination has been recognized as a critical tool in controlling the spread of the virus, reducing severe illness and death, and helping to end the pandemic.
It's important to approach discussions about the COVID-19 pandemic with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to accuracy, recognizing the complexity of the situation and the need for evidence-based approaches to public health and medical care.
It is maddening that the January 2022 last update excuse is still being used. Ugh!!!
lol. The pandemic caused economic destruction. No, the government response to the pandemic was what caused the economic damage.