Are We Transitioning From a Post Truth To a Post Hope World?

  The old television show The Prisoner always bothered me. 

Nothing was ever resolved, and the ever-shifting sands of half-truths, inneuendo, double meanings and distrust was exhausting.  Give me a corney, but cut-and-dried, episode of Hawaii Five-0 where Danno ‘books’ the killer, any day!  

Now The Prisoner, by comparison, looks almost like a quaint prequil.  Locked in a 15 minute city and never told the real reason/s for his imprisonment, the protagonist tries to make the best of his lot in life.  At least he wasn’t submitted to mRNA experimentation?  There also was no street crime to speak of?  Perhaps ‘The Prisoner’ would be a step up from today’s San Francisco or Los Angeles?

We are endlessly lied to, that is too obvious to ignore, but now I feel as though the lying is more than just those in power covering up their greed, corruption and incompetence; now it feels as though they are lying to us deliberately to demoralize us.  They are saying we know you know we are corrupt.  And guess what; there’s nothing you can do about it.  They say this with the feigned seriousness of your accountant telling you you made illegal deductions.  They are actually mocking you.  You are crying inside, and they are laughing. 

When James Comey said Hillary was ‘extremely careless’ he knew that was not a defense for a statute that explicitly excludes intent as a criteria for determining guilt. In today’s world where getting out of bed can be a thought crime, this statute is one glaring exception.  The mishandling of classified material, regardless of intent, is a crime.  Comey Knew it, Andrew McCabe knew it, Peter Strzok knew it, William ‘Ruby Ridge Coverup’ Barr knew it; even your pool cleaner likely knew it, and yet Hillary walks?  This was not a cover-up, precisely because everyone and their dog knew it was a crime.  There was no crime to cover up.  It’s not as if Vince Foster was about to expose Hillary’s misuse of email and met with an unfortunate accident before he could blow the whistle…  Everyone knew she broke the law precisely because there was/is no intent criteria for charging such a crime. 

There is simply no excuse good enough for mishandling state secrets.  It would be like a Secret Service agent failing to shoot a presidential assassin because he forgot to load his gun.  No one would, or should, believe such a preposterous story, even if true.  Some things, simply cannot be believed, which is why the statute excludes a ‘state of mind’ defense.

So what is Comey really saying to us ‘Prisoners’ when he says ‘extremely careless?’  He’s saying, even if your votes counted (they don’t; Dominion saw to that), we can, and will, do whatever the Hell we please, whenever and wherever we please.  I know what you diminishing number of ‘Normies’ out there are thinking.  Why would the FBI send a small army to raid Roger Stone’s house?  Is Roger Stone some sort of heavily-armed Rambo character?  Doesn’t this make the FBI look bad?  Heavy handed?  Even corrupt!  Yes!  Give that man a Lewinski-free cigar!  Now you’re beginning to come around!  The old FBI, you know, the one that concealed Hoover’s extracurricular hobbies?  Well, that’s the old FBI.  The new FBI wants to investigate parents concerned about what Hoover used to do in his closet being brought to their child’s school.   

They want you to know that no matter how serious the crime is in America, they will focus your money on tilting at the most rediculous windmills they can find, and the more rediculous, the better.  And if they can’t find one, they’ll invent one. Imagine a world where a public health official says ‘take this jab; it will prevent you from getting sick,’ and later finding out that not only was this jab never even studied for its ability to do this very thing but that it’s killing large swaths of the population.  In any other time in human history, these people would have their necks elongated with rope or bisected with blades.  And what do these liars proffer as an excuse for their lies?  They don’t even have the decency to claim the Hillary defense of carelessness; they say ‘we were overly optimistic!’  In other words, they ‘guessed’ it would work, and actually claim that as a legal justification for lying.  Ponder that for a moment; it might be the single most offensive example of gaslighting you will ever see.  So clear, so clean, so evil, it stuns most people into inaction.  They simply don’t know what to do with that type of answer since it side-steps the question entirely.  Walensky wasn’t asked if she was overly-optimistic in her estimates; she was asked if the jab had ever been tested for its ability to prevent transmission, a function on which your betters based every public health mandate (limitations on travel, study, employment).  To this day, people are being denied organ transplants for refusing to play mRNA roulette despite the public admissions of top officials that the jab was never tested for its ability to stop or even slow transmission.

 Have you ever heard one physician or public health official offer any rational explanation for vaccination as a precondition for an organ transplant?  I haven’t.  This too, is a form of gasslighting, failing to explain an action that demands explanation.  It’s like saying do this because I said so, and don’t even dare to question me!  The ‘need’ for a vaccine to receive a heart transplant is treated like an axiomatic fact, like the unchallenged ‘fact’ that cow flatulence causes global warming.  It just does.  Where have you been?  Living in a cave?  Everyone knows cow farts cause global warming?  Are you ignorant or just selfish?

How can American officials talk about blind justice with a straight face after what Lois Lerner pulled?  She’s walking around, free as a bird while Trump Supporters who took uncheduled tours of the Capitol Building are rotting in Gulags without trial. 

I have a suggestion the next time Congress holds publicity stunts masquerading as hearings.  Instead of making campaign speaches masquerading as questions, simply offer the witness a cloze passage, and watch the squirming begin.

1.        Mr. Fauci, those seeking organ transplants should first be required to be fully vaccinated as a pre-condition for being placed on the transplant list because______________________________

2.       Mrs. Clinton, you blamed a youtube video for the attack on Benghazi because __________________________________________

3.       Dr. Walenski, you claimed Covid vaccine mandates were necessary because said vaccines prevented transmission, and you based this assertion on__________________________

4.       MS Lerner, the next time I’m audited, I should simply claim an ‘accidental’ deletion of my deduction receipts because____________________________