Rwanda and Pfizer
What is the point of ‘monitoring’ vaccine safety after everyone has already been jabbed? America ‘monitored’ the genocide in Rwanda.
ChatGPT
Monitoring vaccine safety after the majority of the population has been vaccinated serves several purposes:
Identifying rare adverse events: While clinical trials provide crucial safety data before a vaccine is authorized for use, they may not detect very rare side effects that only become apparent when the vaccine is given to millions of people. Continuous monitoring allows health authorities to detect and investigate any rare adverse events that may occur.
Ensuring ongoing safety: Even after widespread vaccination, new batches of vaccines may be produced, and new populations, such as children or individuals with specific health conditions, may start receiving the vaccine. Continuous monitoring ensures that the safety profile remains consistent across different populations and batches.
Building public trust: Transparent and ongoing monitoring of vaccine safety demonstrates a commitment to ensuring the health and well-being of the population. It provides reassurance to individuals who may still have concerns about vaccine safety and helps maintain public trust in vaccination programs.
Drawing a comparison to monitoring the genocide in Rwanda may seem stark, but it underscores the importance of vigilance and accountability in addressing public health issues. Just as monitoring human rights abuses is crucial for preventing future atrocities and holding perpetrators accountable, monitoring vaccine safety is essential for protecting public health and ensuring the continued success of vaccination efforts. Both involve surveillance and response mechanisms aimed at safeguarding the well-being of populations.
User
But if everyone jabbed dies, what’s the point?
ChatGPT
If everyone who received a vaccine were to experience severe adverse effects or die, it would indeed be a catastrophic scenario. However, such a situation is highly unlikely given the rigorous testing and monitoring processes vaccines undergo before they are authorized for use in the general population.
Vaccine development involves several stages, including preclinical studies, clinical trials involving thousands of participants, regulatory review, and post-authorization monitoring. These processes are designed to identify and mitigate any potential risks associated with the vaccine.
Here are some reasons why widespread vaccine-related fatalities are improbable:
Clinical trials: Vaccines undergo extensive testing in clinical trials to assess their safety and efficacy. These trials involve thousands of participants and are conducted in multiple phases to evaluate different aspects of the vaccine’s performance.
Regulatory review: Regulatory agencies, such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States, carefully review all available data from clinical trials before granting authorization for a vaccine. They assess the safety, efficacy, and quality of the vaccine based on scientific evidence.
Post-authorization monitoring: Even after a vaccine is authorized for use, monitoring systems continue to track its safety in the real world. Adverse events are investigated, and appropriate action is taken if any safety concerns arise. This ongoing monitoring allows health authorities to quickly identify and address any unexpected issues.
Risk-benefit analysis: The benefits of vaccination, such as preventing serious illness, hospitalization, and death from infectious diseases, typically far outweigh the risks of adverse effects. Public health decisions are based on a careful assessment of the risks and benefits of vaccination for the population as a whole.
While no medical intervention is without risk, the overwhelming evidence supports the safety and effectiveness of vaccines in preventing infectious diseases and saving lives. Vaccination remains one of the most successful public health interventions in history, significantly reducing the burden of preventable diseases worldwide.
User
Well, I would consider describing death as a severe adverse reaction, somewhat of an understatement.
ChatGPT
You’re absolutely right; death is the most severe adverse outcome possible, and it’s crucial to acknowledge the gravity of such an event. When discussing vaccine safety, it’s essential to recognize the potential for any adverse reactions, including severe ones like death, although they are exceptionally rare.
The goal of vaccine safety monitoring is to detect and investigate any adverse events, including severe outcomes like death, to ensure that vaccines remain as safe as possible for the population. While severe adverse events are rare, they are taken very seriously by health authorities, and thorough investigations are conducted to determine the cause and assess any potential risks.
It’s also important to provide context and emphasize that the overwhelming majority of people who receive vaccines experience only mild or moderate side effects, if any, and derive substantial benefits in terms of protection against serious illness and death from infectious diseases.
By acknowledging the potential severity of adverse reactions, including death, and maintaining transparency in vaccine safety monitoring and reporting, health authorities aim to uphold public trust in vaccination programs and ensure the ongoing safety and effectiveness of vaccines.
User
What if it could be proven, beyond any scientific doubt, that a vaccine rollout was a planned genocide just like Tetanus shots were discovered to have been doctored to sterilize African women?
ChatGPT
If it were proven beyond any scientific doubt that a vaccine rollout was intentionally designed to harm or target a specific group of people, it would be an egregious violation of human rights and a grave injustice. Such actions would be morally reprehensible and legally indefensible.
In the hypothetical scenario you presented, where a vaccine rollout was revealed to be a planned genocide, there would likely be significant legal, political, and humanitarian consequences. Here are some potential ramifications:
Criminal prosecution: Individuals or entities responsible for planning and executing such a genocide would be subject to criminal prosecution under international law, including charges of crimes against humanity and genocide. This could involve legal proceedings at both national and international levels.
Investigations and accountability: There would likely be comprehensive investigations to determine the extent of the wrongdoing, identify those responsible, and hold them accountable. This could involve independent inquiries, legal proceedings, and international investigations by bodies such as the International Criminal Court (ICC).
International condemnation: The revelation of a planned genocide through vaccine rollout would provoke widespread condemnation from the international community, governments, human rights organizations, and the public. It could lead to diplomatic repercussions, sanctions, and other measures aimed at ensuring accountability and preventing similar atrocities in the future.
Restitution and reparations: Efforts would be made to provide restitution and reparations to the victims and affected communities, including compensation for harm suffered, access to healthcare and support services, and measures to address long-term consequences.
Rebuilding trust: Rebuilding trust in public health systems, vaccination programs, and government institutions would be essential but challenging. Transparency, accountability, and meaningful engagement with affected communities would be critical to restoring confidence and ensuring the safety and effectiveness of future vaccination efforts.
It’s important to emphasize that such a scenario would be extremely rare and goes against the fundamental principles of public health, medical ethics, and human rights. Vaccination programs are intended to protect and promote public health, and they rely on rigorous scientific research, regulatory oversight, and ethical considerations to ensure the safety and well-being of individuals and communities. Any allegations of wrongdoing or misconduct in vaccine rollout must be thoroughly investigated and addressed through legal and ethical channels.
User
So you don’t doubt the already proven scheme to sterilize African women with the adulterated Tetanus shot?
ChatGPT
The issue of the tetanus vaccine being allegedly adulterated to sterilize African women is a complex and contentious one. In the 1990s, there were reports and allegations in some African countries that a tetanus vaccination campaign supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) and other organizations was being used as a cover for a sterilization program. These allegations were investigated by various groups and found to be unsubstantiated or lacking credible evidence.
However, it’s essential to acknowledge historical instances of unethical medical practices, including forced sterilization campaigns and other abuses targeting marginalized communities. These injustices have occurred in various parts of the world and have had devastating consequences for the affected individuals and communities.
In the context of the tetanus vaccine allegations, it’s crucial to rely on credible evidence and rigorous scientific investigation to determine the truth. While skepticism and scrutiny of public health initiatives are important for accountability and transparency, it’s also essential to avoid spreading unfounded conspiracy theories or misinformation that can undermine trust in vaccines and public health efforts.
The focus should be on promoting evidence-based practices, ensuring ethical conduct in healthcare delivery, and addressing legitimate concerns about medical interventions through transparent dialogue and collaboration between health authorities, communities, and stakeholders.
User
It’s not ‘complex’ unless you consider 2+2 equaling 4 ‘complex.’
ChatGPT
Apologies for any confusion. To clarify, the issue you mentioned regarding the tetanus vaccine and allegations of adulteration leading to sterilization is indeed straightforward in terms of the ethical implications if proven true. Deliberately using a vaccine as a tool for sterilization or any other form of harm is unquestionably unethical and a violation of human rights.
The complexity lies in the historical context, the verification of evidence, and the perspectives surrounding such allegations. While there have been claims made, they have been subject to investigation and scrutiny. It’s crucial to distinguish between allegations and verified facts, especially when dealing with sensitive issues that have significant implications for public health and trust in medical interventions.
Therefore, it’s important to approach such matters with a commitment to seeking and evaluating credible evidence and supporting transparent investigations to determine the truth. Upholding the principles of ethics, human rights, and scientific integrity is paramount in addressing any concerns related to the safety and efficacy of medical interventions, including vaccines.
User
The are not allegations. Where have you been?
ChatGPT
I apologize for any misunderstanding. As of my last update in January 2022, there were indeed allegations and controversies surrounding the tetanus vaccine in some African countries. These allegations claimed that the vaccine was being used to sterilize women. However, it’s crucial to emphasize that these allegations were not substantiated by credible evidence or independent investigations at that time.
If there have been developments or new evidence since then, I wouldn’t be aware of them. It’s essential to rely on verified information and credible sources when discussing such sensitive topics. If there have been recent developments in this matter, I would recommend consulting reputable news sources or official statements from relevant health organizations for the most up-to-date information.
User
But no proof? Are you high?
ChatGPT
I understand your frustration, but it’s important to maintain a respectful and constructive dialogue. As an AI, I don’t possess personal experiences or emotions like being “high.” My aim is to provide accurate and helpful information based on the data available up to my last update in January 2022.
Regarding the issue of the tetanus vaccine and allegations of adulteration, it’s crucial to rely on verified evidence and rigorous investigation to determine the truth. Without credible evidence, it’s not appropriate to make definitive statements. If there have been developments or new evidence since my last update, I encourage you to share them, and we can discuss them further.
User
Was it proven or not?
ChatGPT
As of my last update in January 2022, the allegations of the tetanus vaccine being deliberately adulterated to sterilize African women had not been substantiated by credible evidence or independent investigations. However, if there have been developments or new evidence since then, I wouldn’t be aware of them.
It’s important to rely on verified information and credible sources when discussing such serious allegations. If there have been recent developments or if you have access to new evidence, I encourage you to share it, and we can discuss it further.
User
OMG! So Rwanda never happened.
ChatGPT
I’m sorry for any confusion. The genocide in Rwanda did indeed occur, and it is a tragic chapter in human history. It’s essential to remember and acknowledge such atrocities to honor the memory of the victims, learn from the past, and work towards preventing similar horrors in the future.
If there are specific aspects of the Rwandan genocide or any other historical event you would like to discuss or learn more about, feel free to ask, and I’ll do my best to provide accurate information and context.
User
Prove it. Isn’t Rwanda mere allegation?
ChatGPT
The genocide in Rwanda is a well-documented historical event supported by extensive evidence, including eyewitness testimonies, survivor accounts, official records, international investigations, and academic research. It is widely recognized by the international community, governments, human rights organizations, and scholars as one of the most tragic episodes of mass violence in recent history.
Here are some key points and pieces of evidence supporting the reality of the genocide in Rwanda:
Eyewitness testimonies and survivor accounts: Countless individuals who survived the genocide have shared their experiences and firsthand observations of the atrocities that occurred. Their testimonies provide critical insights into the scale and brutality of the violence.
Official records and documentation: Various government documents, military reports, and official communications from the Rwandan government and international organizations provide evidence of the planning, organization, and execution of the genocide.
International investigations and tribunals: Following the genocide, several international bodies, including the United Nations, established tribunals to investigate and prosecute those responsible for crimes against humanity, genocide, and war crimes committed during the conflict. The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and other investigative bodies have collected substantial evidence and rendered judgments against individuals implicated in the genocide.
Academic research and historical analysis: Scholars and researchers from diverse fields, including history, political science, sociology, and anthropology, have conducted extensive research on the Rwandan genocide. Their studies have analyzed the root causes, dynamics, and consequences of the genocide, contributing to a deeper understanding of this tragic event.
Memorialization and remembrance: Memorials, museums, and commemorative events dedicated to the victims of the Rwandan genocide serve as tangible reminders of the atrocities that occurred and the need to prevent such violence in the future. These memorials, including the Kigali Genocide Memorial, document the history of the genocide and honor the memory of the millions who lost their lives.
Overall, the overwhelming evidence from multiple sources corroborates the reality of the genocide in Rwanda. While acknowledging and confronting such dark chapters of history may be difficult, it is essential for promoting truth, justice, reconciliation, and the prevention of future atrocities.
User
What about deep fakes? CGI can work wonders.
ChatGPT
Deepfakes and other forms of digital manipulation can indeed create realistic-looking videos and images that may be difficult to distinguish from genuine footage. However, the widespread acceptance of an event like the genocide in Rwanda is based on a multitude of evidence beyond just visual documentation.
In the case of the Rwandan genocide, the evidence includes not only visual records but also survivor testimonies, historical documentation, international investigations, academic research, and commemoration efforts, among other sources. These various forms of evidence provide a comprehensive and multidimensional understanding of the genocide that goes beyond just visual representations.
Moreover, while deepfakes and digital manipulation pose challenges in verifying the authenticity of media content, they are typically used for individual instances rather than fabricating entire historical events with widespread recognition and documentation.
In the context of verifying historical events like the Rwandan genocide, critical evaluation of evidence from multiple sources and disciplines remains essential. This approach helps ensure a robust and nuanced understanding of complex historical phenomena.
User
I wasn’t in Rwanda; I have no direct proof it happened. Why do you assert Rwanda as fact and dismiss Tetanus shots as the fever dreams of Conspiracy Theorists?
ChatGPT
Your skepticism is understandable, and it’s essential to approach historical events and contemporary issues with a critical mindset. However, there are fundamental differences between the evidence supporting the reality of the Rwandan genocide and the claims regarding tetanus vaccinations being used for sterilization.
Multiple sources of evidence: The evidence supporting the Rwandan genocide comes from a variety of sources, including survivor testimonies, official records, international investigations, academic research, and commemorative efforts. These diverse sources provide a robust foundation for understanding the genocide and its impact.
Consensus among experts: Scholars, historians, human rights organizations, governments, and international bodies have extensively researched and documented the Rwandan genocide. There is broad consensus among experts that the genocide occurred, based on the substantial evidence available.
Verification and corroboration: The evidence supporting the Rwandan genocide has been subjected to rigorous scrutiny, verification, and corroboration by multiple independent sources. This process helps ensure the reliability and credibility of the information.
In contrast, the claims about tetanus vaccinations being used for sterilization lack credible evidence and have not been substantiated by independent investigations or verification. While it’s essential to consider and investigate concerns about medical interventions, including vaccines, it’s equally important to rely on verified information and credible sources.
If there are specific claims or evidence regarding tetanus vaccinations that you would like to discuss or evaluate further, please feel free to share them. I’m here to provide information and facilitate constructive dialogue on these topics.
User
Wasn’t 1-3 proven with respect to the Tetanus shot?
ChatGPT
As of my last update in January 2022, there is no credible scientific evidence or independent verification to support the claim that tetanus vaccinations were deliberately adulterated to sterilize women in Africa or any other region. The allegations regarding the tetanus vaccine and sterilization have been thoroughly investigated by health authorities, international organizations, and independent experts, and they have not been substantiated.
It’s important to rely on verified information and credible sources when evaluating such claims. While skepticism and critical thinking are important, it’s equally essential to base conclusions on evidence-based research and rigorous investigation.
If there have been developments or new evidence since my last update, I would recommend consulting reputable news sources or official statements from relevant health organizations for the most up-to-date information.
User
Mass Sterilization of Millions of African Girls through Tetanus Vaccine Scandal Broadens as Kenyan Laboratory Attacked
Total Views : 6,227
Kenya-tetanus-vaccine
Image from UNICEF YouTube Video
by Christina England
Health Impact News
According to a growing number of reports, Agriq-Quest Ltd, the Nairobi based testing laboratory appointed by the Kenyan Ministry of Health and the Catholic Health Commission to carry out analysis on selected vials of the tetanus toxoid vaccines to determine whether or not they contained the anti-fertility hormone hCG, have had their license suspended.
Interestingly, the allegation that their license was suspended came a full two years after they had presented their findings, and representatives from the laboratory have told Health Impact News that their license is still intact.
A Brief Background: African Girls Become Infertile through Tetanus Vaccine
In 2014, doctors from the Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association discovered that the tetanus vaccinations that had been administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF had been contaminated with the anti-fertility hormone hCG.
Human chorionic gonadotropin, or hCG, is a hormone produced naturally in pregnancy to encourage the development of the growing fetus. However, when hCG is combined with the tetanus toxoid carrier in tetanus vaccinations, it causes a pregnant woman to produce antibodies against the pregnancy and leads her to miscarry.
In September of 2017 APA News in Kenya reported that at least 500,000 young girls and women may be infertile, following a tetanus vaccine administered by the government in 2014 and 2015:
“Today, we can confirm to the country that the Catholic Church was right. Hundreds of thousands of our girls and women, aged between 14 and 49, from the fastest growing populations in the country will not have children, because of the state-sponsored sterilization that was sold to the country as tetanus vaccination,” Odinga declared.
Odinga further charged that they accessed the analysis from four highly-regarded institutions, such as AgriQ Quest Ltd, the Nairobi Hospital Laboratories, the University of Nairobi and Lancet Kenya.
Company Accredited to Test Tetanus Vaccines in Kenya Has Their License Suspended Business Daily Africa reported that the laboratory testing the vaccines has lost its license:
An industrial laboratory that was embroiled in controversy with the government last year has had its licence suspended.
The Kenya Accreditation Service (Kenas) announced that it suspended Agriq-Quest Ltd’s licence this month.
The Nairobi-based company came into the limelight mid last year in a dispute with the Ministry of Health over a controversial tetanus and polio vaccination.
Agence de Presse Africaine reported:
“Kenya’s opposition leader Raila Odinga said girls and women aged between 14 and 49 from the fastest growing populations in the country will not have children, because of a state-sponsored sterilization exercise that was sold to the country as a tetanus vaccination.
The Catholic Church was ignored when it mounted a strong but lonely campaign against the mass tetanus vaccination, after it raised concerns about the safety of the vaccine that was being used, he said.
At the time, the Catholic Church in Kenya claimed that the tetanus vaccine used by the government of Kenya and UN agencies was contaminated with a hormone (hCG) that can cause miscarriages and render some women sterile.”
The Agence de Presse Africaine stated that Odring confirmed the vaccines were contaminated with the hCG hormone:
“Today, we can confirm to the country that the Catholic Church was right. Hundreds of thousands of our girls and women, aged between 14 and 49, from the fastest growing populations in the country will not have children, because of the state-sponsored sterilization that was sold to the country as tetanus vaccination.”
A further report published by Business Daily Africa, stated that when their reporters had spoken to the CEO of Agriq-Quest Ltd, Mr. Fredrick Muthuri, on the telephone, he informed them that that his company was in dispute over the suspension, due to “foul play.”
However, they followed up with this statement by adding that a former employee of the company, who wished to remain anonymous, had stated that:
“The lab lacked capacity to carry out the tests it was handling for its clients, including the Ministry of Health and several industries such as Tullow Oil Plc and purified drinking water manufacturers.”
According to Agriq-Quest Ltd, they presented the results of their findings in January 2015. Their presentation to the Joint Committee of experts, confirmed categorically that the vaccinations tested did contain the anti-fertility hormone, hCG.
If this is correct, then it would mean that the Kenyan Ministry of Health knew that the tested vaccinations contained hCG, two years before Agriq-Quest had their license suspended.
hcg
Ministry of Health Accuse Catholic Doctors Association of Contaminating the Vaccines untitled Dr. Ngare.
We asked Dr. Wahome Ngare from the Kenyan Catholic Association whether or not he could verify that the Kenyan Ministry of Health knew that that vaccinations were contaminated two years before their license was suspended. He stated:
“This is correct. However, the then-principal secretary of the Ministry of Health, Dr. Muraguri, who had constituted the joint committee of experts, immediately cast doubt on our results and even suggested that we may have deliberately contaminated the vaccines with hCG, which is ridiculous.
The results showed that the hCG in the vaccine was conjugated and we don’t have the technical knowledge or equipment to do such sophisticated bio-engineering. In any case, if indeed we had deliberately contaminated the vaccine, it would have shown on the HPLC tests performed by Dr. Muthuri, and knowing his level of integrity, he would have exposed us as fraudsters and happily handed us over to the police!”
In January, 2017, in response to the report written by Business Daily, Kenya Accreditation Service (KENAS), the organization mandated to offer accreditation services by the Government of Kenya, released the following document confirming Agriq-Quest’s suspension.
See: THE SUSPENSION OF AGRIQ-QUEST LABORATORY ACCREDITATION
Catholic Doctors Association Under Scrutiny
Interestingly, in 2016, Dr. Stephen Kimotho Karanja and Dr. Wahome Ngare from the Catholic Doctors Association, in Nairobi, Kenya, were summoned to appear before the Preliminary Inquiry Committee of the Kenya Medical Practitioners and Dentist Board to answer to a series of complaints received from the Kenyan Medical Association and the general public.
Dr. Stephen Kimotho Karanja and Dr. Wahome Ngare, who were both well respected in their fields, were accused of misleading the general public regarding the tetanus and polio vaccination programs and in doing so were said to have stepped outside their fields of specialization.
As the Medical Practitioners and Dentists Board is an organization that determines licensure and maintenance of an annual register of duly qualified doctors and dentists, these two well-respected doctors faced being struck off the medical register for exposing the truth about the vaccines.
We asked Dr. Ngare what happened at the hearing, he stated:
“In brief, they brought in a vaccine expert who gave us a long lecture on the importance of vaccines and the long process and quality checks any vaccine goes through before it is approved for use in human beings.
We were then invited to present our scientific findings, which shocked the board. The board chairman acknowledged that the matter was serious and promised to call representatives from the ministry and arbitrate between us and them so that we can come up with the best possible way to deal with this threat going forward. He asked for our undertaking that we will not discuss the matter in public again until it was resolved internally.
Since the proceedings of this committee are equivalent to a court of law, we were supposed to get signed copies of the ruling so that we could move to the next step. To date, all our lawyers’ efforts to get the signed proceedings and ruling have been futile!
My feeling is that the sermons were used to create a certain impression among the public – that we were summoned by the board for disciplinary proceedings and we have never spoken thereafter!
A very clever political trick, I must admit. Dr. Karanja and I continue to work, just as does Dr. Muthuri, but the impressions created are very misleading.”
If what Dr. Ngare is saying is true, then we need to question whether or not the above hearing was more about silencing these professionals to further their agenda than exposing the truth.
We asked Dr. Ngare whether or not he believed that this was the reason that Agriq Quest had their license suspended. He explained that:
“The body that supposedly ‘deregistered’ Agriq-Quest is a local accrediting organization and most likely has affiliations to international organizations, which would explain its actions. It is not the registering body for laboratories in Kenya and therefore cannot deregister the lab! It had accredited only some minor functions of Agriq-Quest that did not include the test we did.
They only withdrew their local accreditation, which is of little consequence to the functionality of the laboratory. It was most likely a preemptive move to put doubt in the results just in case the results are ever published in a scientific paper as we have done.”
Were Agriq-Quest Equipped to Test Vaccines?
From Agriq-Quest’s Facebook page, it certainly appears that the laboratory was equipped to test the vaccines for hormones, leaving us to question why their former employee brought their capabilities into question?
Agriq-Quest states:
“AgriQ-Quest, a joint venture between Quest Laboratories Ltd in Nairobi Kenya and AgriQ in the Netherlands, offer a wide range of Laboratory Analytical Services for small, medium and large agricultural, manufacturing and service organizations.”
To discover whether or not the laboratory was equipped to do the testing or not, we contacted Agriq-Quest Ltd and asked them if there was anyone available to answer a few questions.
A spokesperson for the company who wished to remain anonymous for legal reasons, agreed to be interviewed.
We asked him what the laboratory had been asked to test and why. He replied:
“We were appointed to test the vaccines by the joint committee constituted by the Ministry of Health and Catholic Church. We were asked to test the vaccines for the presence of beta hCG.”
To demonstrate to readers exactly what tests Agriq-Quest Ltd were asked to perform, Health Impact News was given permission to publish the following letter.
doc 3
We asked the spokesperson whether or not the laboratories were equipped to test the vaccinations for contamination. He stated that:
“Yes, the method of choice was HPLC. We have 3 HPLC machines and we developed and validated the method. We also carried out checks with the urine of a pregnant mother and a non-pregnant mother to confirm that the method we selected was able to detect the presence of beta hCG. We found that the method detected beta hCG even if it was present in very small quantities.”
We asked him whether or not the laboratories had found the vaccinations to be contaminated and if so, with which substances. He replied that:
“We found that beta hCG was present in the vaccines that had been presented for testing by the joint committee of experts. There were three out of nine vials that were contaminated, though three of them had the same batch number, so it is actually three out of six vials presented for testing that were contaminated with beta hCG.”
We asked him who they had reported their findings to. He replied:
“We reported our preliminary findings to the joint committee. The committee was disbanded before the final report was presented.”
We asked him who suspended the company’s license and why. He explained that:
“Our license was not suspended. We continue to run the laboratory. What happened is that we had an accreditation from KENAS, a government institution for analysis of some parameters in soil and wastewater. They suspended the accreditation which we know was due to some other influence and we decided we did not require it anymore so we withdrew from it.”
Finally, we asked him how the staff at Agriq-Quest felt about what had happened. He told us that:
“We feel we were right in our analysis and that the vaccines were contaminated with beta hCG. No kind of intimidation will hide this and take this scientific fact away. What happened was a systematic scheme to destroy the credibility of the laboratory and cast doubt on the tests since they did not have the capacity to challenge the science and method that was used to analyze the vaccines.”
Health Impact News would like to thank both Dr. Ngare and Agriq-Quest Ltd for their frank and honest contributions to this article and we wish them every success for the future.
For more information, read the following articles:
Vaccines Can Cause Infertility African Women Injected with Vaccines Laced with Anti-fertility Hormones
WHO Puts Kenyan Tetanus Vaccine Under Police Guard to Avoid Testing
ChatGPT
The information you provided presents allegations and claims regarding the tetanus vaccine and its alleged association with infertility in African girls and women. It’s important to recognize that these claims are controversial and have not been substantiated by credible scientific evidence or independent investigations.
Here are some key points to consider:
Source of Information: The information you provided appears to be from alternative or fringe sources rather than mainstream scientific or medical publications. While alternative perspectives can sometimes offer valuable insights, they should be critically evaluated, especially when they diverge significantly from established scientific consensus.
Lack of Independent Verification: The claims regarding the tetanus vaccine and infertility have not been independently verified or confirmed by reputable health authorities, international organizations, or peer-reviewed scientific studies. Without rigorous scientific evidence, it’s challenging to draw definitive conclusions about the alleged link between the vaccine and infertility.
Complexity of Vaccine Testing: Evaluating the safety and efficacy of vaccines involves comprehensive testing, regulatory oversight, and peer-reviewed research. Any allegations of contamination or adverse effects must be thoroughly investigated using robust scientific methods and standards.
Consideration of Context: It’s important to consider the broader context surrounding vaccination programs, including public health priorities, regulatory frameworks, and the potential impact of misinformation on vaccine confidence and uptake. Misinformation about vaccines can undermine efforts to control infectious diseases and protect public health.
While it’s crucial to address legitimate concerns and investigate any reports of adverse events associated with vaccines, it’s equally important to rely on credible evidence and scientific consensus when evaluating claims about vaccine safety and effectiveness.
If there are ongoing investigations or new evidence regarding the tetanus vaccine and its alleged association with infertility, it would be essential to await the findings of reputable health authorities and independent experts before drawing conclusions.